Insert:    
Visibility:     Module:   

Blog Posts

Sign Our Congressional Funding Letter Today!


Just under two weeks ago, I posted in this space, and asked all of you to sign on to a letter to Congress and  to call your representative to press for funding for lead poisoning prevention, lead hazard control, and healthy homes programs at HUD and CDC. Thanks to those of you who did - we got a record number of sign-ons in the House of Representatives!

We held a terrific Healthy Homes Capitol Hill Day on Tuesday, March 17, with attendees from key states meeting with leaders of the health and housing appropriations subcommittees. Over one-quarter of our meetings were with the senators and representatives themselves, and many of them made a pledge to fight for these critically important programs. (More on this soon!) We hope you can join us on the hill in future years!

But the battle is not yet won until the funding is actually approved. That's why I'm asking you to ACT AGAIN to call your senators and request their support for similar letters circulating there. Signatures are due TODAY, so we need you to call ASAP!

Please follow these two steps now to ensure healthy homes and lead hazard control/poisoning prevention programs continue!

STEP 1: If you haven't yet, sign your organization to the letter to Congress for HUD and CDC funding. And please forward this email to your networks!

STEP 2: Call your senators!

  1. Call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at 202.224.3121 and ask to be connected to one of your senators. If you don't know your senators' names, they can tell you who they are.
  2. Ask to speak with the staff person who handles the health or housing issues for the office.
  3. When you reach the staffer, or leave a message, or speak to the receptionist if the staffer is not available, tell him or her:

    •  My name is __________________.  I'm from __________________ [your city and state].
    • I'm calling to urge the senator to sign on to letters from Senator Jack Reed in support of lead poisoning prevention and healthy homes. The sign-on letter deadline is March 25.
    • These funds will ensure the protection of over 500,000 lead-poisoned children who need CDC- and HUD-funded services.
    • Thank you!
 4.  Now, call your other senator. Follow the first three steps again, simply asking for your other senator.


I can't stress enough the importance of your help on this. It's only with your help that we can win this budget battle.

Fund Healthy Housing NOW!

ACT NOW to ensure continued funding for HUD’s Office of Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes and CDC’s Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Prevention Program!

The home is the most dangerous place for U.S. families. Nearly six million families live in housing rivaling that of developing countries, with broken heating and plumbing, holes in walls and windows, roach and rodent infestation, falling plaster, crumbling foundations, and leaking roofs. Millions more in all 50 states live in housing with serious health and safety hazards including mold, exposed wiring, radon, unvented heaters, toxic chemicals, broken stairs, missing smoke detectors, and other hazards. Home-based interventions to address health hazards improve health and have a large return on investment: Each dollar invested in lead paint hazard control results in a return of $17 to $221, and each dollar invested in asthma home-based interventions that include education and remediation results in a return of $5.30 to $14.00.

That's why it makes both great common sense and great fiscal sense to direct more funding to the critical government programs that invest money in America's future by making homes safer and healthier. Unfortunately, these programs are always in serious danger of debilitating budget cutting.

Please take these simple steps now to ensure healthy homes and lead hazard control and lead /poisoning prevention programs continue!


STEP 1: SIGN your organization on to the attached letter to Congress for HUD and CDC funding.

Click here to sign on to the attached letter. And forward these links to your networks!


STEP 2: CALL your representative in the U.S. House!

1. Call the U.S. Capitol switchboard at 202.224.3121 and ask to be connected to your representative. (If you don't know who your representative is, the switchboard can tell you based on your address.)

2. Ask to speak with the staff person who handles the health or housing issues for the office.

3. When you reach or leave a message for the staffer (or speak to the receptionist if the staffer is not available), tell him or her:

  • "I'm calling to urge Representative [representative's last name] to sign on to the Congresswoman Slaughter sign-on letter in support of healthy homes and lead poisoning prevention funding for HUD and CDC. The sign-on letter deadline is March 19.
  • "I also urge the representative to submit a request to the health appropriations subcommittee to fund CDC’s Healthy Homes and Lead Poisoning Prevention Program at $29 million.
  • "These funds will ensure the protection of over 500,000 lead-poisoned children who need CDC-funded services.
  • "Thank you!"

STEP 3: Call your senators! (Coming soon!)

Only you can help us win this budget battle.

Formaldehyde and Wood Products

Chinese manufacturing companies have again exported unsafe products into the U.S. On March 1, a 60 Minutes exposé brought back memories of 2005, when thousands of people displaced by Hurricane Katrina suffered from high formaldehyde emissions in the trailers that the federal government provided for them.
 
The 60 Minutes report revealed that low-cost laminated flooring, purchased from Lumber Liquidators stores around the country, released extremely high levels of formaldehyde that off-gas from the cured glue used to make the fiberboard in the flooring. All but one of the samples from China failed the emissions tests, with some readings as much as 20 times California’s standards. In contrast, the samples from North America all passed. On hidden camera, 60 Minutes filmed workers in three Chinese manufacturing facilities admitting that they knew the wood going to Lumber Liquidators flooring did not comply with the so-called “CARB 2” standards.

When NCHH, Sierra Club, and industry leaders (especially the Composite Panel Association), partnered in 2008 to nationalize California’s tough emission standards for wood products, they recognized the problem and knew that a federal law was essential to ensure compliance by foreign companies importing products to the U.S., as well as to ensure enforceability throughout our nation.
 
Led by Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Senator Mike Crapo (R-ID), and Representative Doris Matsui (D-CA), Congress passed the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act in the summer of 2010, amending the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA). Congress acted in a bipartisan manner to protect consumer health and level the playing field between U.S. wood product manufacturers and their offshore competitors.
 
In that legislation, Congress directed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to issue final rules by the end of 2012, with the rules to be effective a year later. EPA issued proposed rules in June 2013; however, we are still waiting on EPA to issue the final rules 26 months after the deadline.

As a practical matter, the initial deadline was unrealistic for an agency struggling with funding cuts and other pressures. The record shows that EPA waited a year for the White House’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to complete its 90-day review. OMB only released the rule after EPA revised its cost-benefit analysis to remove $250 million in estimated annual benefits resulting from 21,000 fewer children developing asthma. Another year was lost when many in the industry strenuously objected to EPA’s science-based decision to go beyond the California Air Resource Board (CARB) requirements – as Congress had authorized– and require third-party testing and certification not only by wood panel producers, as is already required by California, but also by laminators of wood products.

At each step of the process, NCHH sought to move the issue forward. In collaboration with other public interest groups, we submitted comments on the proposed emission standards and alerted EPA that “third-party” auditors in China may be cutting corners. In May 2014, NCHH proposed a compromise to the EPA-industry dispute over testing and certification requirements for laminators. And we called for testing of the finished product so that regulators could verify compliance.

The 60 Minutes story illustrates how critical it is that EPA act and issue its rules implementing the national standard on formaldehyde emissions from composite wood products. Representative Kurt Schrader of Oregon pressed the EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy at a February 25 hearing. In a March 3 letter to Ms. McCarthy, congressional sponsors called for prompt issuance of the final rule. The next day, Senator Ben Nelson (D-FL) reinforced the call, asking for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Federal Trade Commission, and Consumer Products Safety Commission to work with EPA and investigate the issue as the agencies did with the Chinese drywall problems several years ago.

Indeed, it’s time for EPA to act and for the White House to make sure that OMB doesn’t cause more delays. Just as importantly, it’s critical that EPA get the regulation right and do everything possible to keep the situation that reported by 60 Minutes from happening again. Our recent history with these unscrupulous Chinese companies shows that we should be prepared for more cheating. EPA must provide mechanisms to catch these cheaters. This includes third-party, verifiably independent testing and certification, as well as a means to randomly deconstruct and test wood products sold into the U.S. consumer market. To date, EPA has declined to adopt the latter for the national rules, even though California is committed to it. Without such testing, 60 Minutes could not have made clear that Chinese laminated flooring was mislabeled as CARB 2-compliant and emitted dangerously high amounts of formaldehyde, far beyond the bounds of California’s regulations.

EPA's Formaldehyde and Composite Wood Products rule is important for American consumers and especially for the children who are most vulnerable to irritation and toxic exposure. Its implementation is expected to prevent tens of thousands of children from developing asthma and will level the playing field for North American manufacturers that produce safer, compliant products. EPA needs to hold its ground and finally promulgate – and be able to enforce – effective standards for laminators of composite wood products.


UPDATE (May 3): The New York Times interviewed NCHH's Tom Neltner for an article about the EPA's regulation of formaldehyde. Read it here.

UPDATE (May 8): NCHH's Tom Neltner appeared on a CBS News segment about the Lumber Liquidators controversy. Watch it here.

EPA Safer Choices

Bewildered by the vast number of cleaning products available when shopping online or in your local supermarket? Today, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced a way to narrow your choices of products so you make your home healthier. Just look for the “Safer Choice” logo on the product. Use EPA’s search engine to check whether your favorite brand carries the label.

If you’re worried about fragrances irritating your eyes or lungs, look for labels with "Fragrance Free" in the upper left corner. Unlike products advertised as “unscented,” which contain masking fragrances to hide the chemical smell, these products are what they claim to be – fragrance-free.

The logo replaces the cumbersome "Design for the Environment” ("DfE") logo that you may have seen on some products in recent years. EPA’s action comes just over a year after Walmart committed to having all of its private brand cleaning products meet the DfE (now Safer Choice) standards by January 2015. 

So, how do you know the Safer Choice products are actually safer? EPA requires that manufacturers disclose all ingredients, including fragrances, to a third party who ensures that the products meet the agency’s strict criteria for safety and performance. It also sets packaging standards and bans fragrances that government agencies in the U.S. and Europe have identified as carcinogens, reproductive toxins, or sensitizers. And, in a relatively new feature, it audits the products for compliance. 

Finally, EPA enables you to make your own decision about safety by requiring that makers of Safer Choice-labeled products disclose all ingredients on the company’s website and reference the Web page on the product label. With this option, if you’re worried about a particular ingredient, you can make sure it’s not in the product. 

Note that there is an important limit to disclosure. To balance trade secret concerns for fragrances, EPA allows companies to provide a list of chemicals used across their various brands, rather than revealing the specific ingredients of a single product. If you want to know what the ingredients are in a single product, your only option appears to be S.C. Johnson. It’s the only firm we know of that goes a step beyond EPA’s labeling standards and names all of the ingredients in each product.

So, next time you’re shopping for cleaning products, look for EPA’s Safer Choice logo for a healthier home.

APHA, NCHH Release Healthy Housing Standard

A new standard published Monday will serve as a blueprint for ensuring the health and safety of U.S. homes.

APHA and the National Center for Healthy Housing released a standard that defines livable housing conditions, targeting the 30 million U.S. families who live in unsafe residences. The standard is intended to be used by government agencies and property owners to make certain that the nation’s housing stock is adequately maintained and protects the health and safety of residents.

“We look forward to seeing lives saved and communities stabilized as the code provisions are implemented,” said Georges Benjamin, MD, executive director of APHA, in a news release.

The National Healthy Housing Standard identifies hazardous living conditions and offers safety protections to address these problems, with recommendations for household systems, including:

  • plumbing;
  • lighting and electricity;
  • heating, ventilation and energy efficiency;
  • moisture and mold control;
  • pest management; and
  • chemicals such as radon, lead, formaldehyde and asbestos.

According to Jon Gant, director at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the standard helps advance a federal housing strategy released by the agency on Feb. 4. It also updates a document co-produced by APHA and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 1986, using evidence connecting housing quality to asthma, cancer and other injuries.

“The development of this health-based standard is just the first step. The most important work of seeking its adoption by federal, state and local agencies is a heavy lift and will require the help and involvement of a wide array of partners,” said Rebecca Morley, executive director of the National Center for Healthy Housing.

The National Committee on Housing and Health, which monitored the standard’s development is requesting comments on the standard through July 31.

Disqus Comments

Archive

Archive by Years
Categories